An interim measure (neodkladné opatrenie) serves only to secure a child's basic needs temporarily, to the necessary extent, and the court does not grant it automatically. If the obliged parent's circumstances are not proven, the court generally awards 30% of the subsistence minimum for a dependent child (EUR 40.44 from 1 July 2026); where income is proven, it may award a higher amount.

The legal rules on interim measures in maintenance matters apply to all types of maintenance obligations arising under the Slovak Family Act. In the case of a maintenance obligation towards a minor child, the court may even commence proceedings of its own motion (without an application).
The purpose of this instrument is not to resolve the question of the maintenance obligation definitively, but to provide immediate protection of the child's basic living needs in situations where a parent is not fulfilling their statutory obligation voluntarily and no prior court regulation of it exists (established by a judgment or an enforceable resolution).
The court grants an interim measure only where strict conditions are met:
The measure is typically ordered where the parent personally caring for the child is unemployed, on long-term sick leave, a recipient of a disability pension, on maternity or parental leave, or without means, and their income is insufficient to cover the child's essential needs.
An interim measure is strictly provisional in nature – its role is to bridge the period until the decision on the merits. It is not meant to prejudge the final decision, in which the court comprehensively assesses all of the child's justified needs as well as the financial circumstances, abilities and capacities of both parents (including retroactively to the date the claim was filed, or, where grounds meriting special consideration exist, up to three years back from the date the proceedings began).
By an interim measure, the court may impose a maintenance obligation only to the necessary extent, even where the obliged parent is able to pay more. The concept of the necessary extent is interpreted restrictively and covers only basic living needs:
Broader justified needs (such as leisure activities, clubs or above-standard equipment) are not taken into account at this stage and become the subject of evidence only in the proceedings on the merits.
When setting the amount, the court distinguishes whether the obliged parent's circumstances have been proven:
The court also takes into account alternative forms of performance, such as direct payment of household running costs, provision of school meals, purchase of seasonal clothing or school supplies, or payment for healthcare.
Based on an analysis of the decision-making practice of Slovak district courts, the court will usually dismiss (or partially dismiss) an application for an interim measure where:
The court must decide on an application for an interim measure within 30 days of the application being served (or of the issue of a resolution commencing proceedings without an application). Court practice shows differing approaches to when the maintenance obligation starts:
If the resolution does not mention a specific date, the obligation arises upon its enforceability. The maintenance obligation arises at the latest on the day the resolution becomes enforceable, which means an obligation to pay without delay after service (including a pro-rata part of the calendar month and the following month).
Practice is inconsistent in several respects:
Considering an interim measure on maintenance?
Alongside the maintenance proceedings, are you struggling to cover your child's basic needs? We will assess your situation and evaluate whether you meet the conditions for demonstrating that the child's maintenance is at risk, so that your application stands up in court.